Further reading

1 Ainsworth, S., de Jong, E. & Hmelo-Silver, C. (2010). On the Process and Outcomes of Inquiry Learning: Changing Approaches to Assessment. In Kimberly Gomez, Leilah Lyons, Joshua Radinsky (Eds) Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Chicago.

2 Beetham, H., Magill, L., & Littlejohn, A. (2009). Thriving in the 21st century: Learning literacies for the digital age. JISC. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/projects/llidareportjune2009.pdf

3 Campbell, S.W. (2006). Perceptions of Mobile Phones in College Classrooms: Ringing, Cheating, and Classroom Policies. Communication Education, 55, 3, 280-294.

4 De Jong, T. & Wilhelm, P. (2010). Assessment and inquiry; issues and
opportunities. In Kimberly Gomez, Leilah Lyons, Joshua Radinsky (Eds) Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Chicago.

5 Collins, T., Joiner, R., White, A. & Braidley, L. (2011). School
trip photomarathons: Engaging primary school visitors using a topic focused photo competition. In: ALT-C 2011, 18th International Conference: Thriving in a Colder and More Challenging Climate, 6-8 September, 2011, Leeds, UK.

6 Cuban, L. (2003). Oversold and Underused: Computers in the Classroom. Harvard University Press.

7 Cox, R. & Lum, C. (2004). Case-based teaching & clinical reasoning: Seeing how students think with PATSy. In Brumfitt, S. (Ed.) Innovations in professional education for Speech and Language Therapists, Whurr.

8 Eshach, H. (2007). Bridging In-school and Out-of-school Learning: Formal, Non-Formal, and Informal Education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(2), pp.171-190 Url: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10956-006-9027-1

9 Feng, M. & Heffernan, N. (2010). Can We Get Better Assessment From A Tutoring System Compared to Traditional Paper Testing? Can We Have Our Cake (Better Assessment) and Eat It too (Student Learning During the Test). In Baker, R.S.J.d., Merceron, A., Pavlik, P.I. Jr. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Educational Data Mining. P 41—50.

10 Garcia Garcia, G. & Cox, R. (2010). An Interactive Educational Diagrammatic System for Assessing and Remediating the Graph-as-Picture Misconception. In J. Kay, J. Mostow, V. Aleven, (eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems, V2. Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-13436-4

11 Goldin-Meadow, S. (2009). How gesture promotes learning throughout childhood. Child Development Perspectives, 3(2), 106-111.

12 Goldin-Meadow, S. (1997). When gestures and words speak differently. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 6(5), 138-143.

13 Gorman, P., Nelson, T., Glassman, A. (2004). Organizational Analysis, Vol 12, No. 3, pp. 255-270. http://www.simmons.edu/som/faculty/docs/the_millennial_generation_a_strategic_opportunity.pdf

14 Habgood, M.P.J. & Ainsworth, S.E. (2011). Motivating children to learn effectively: Exploring the value of intrinsic integration in educational games. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 20 (2) 169-206.

15 Higgins, S., Mercier, E., Burd, L., & Joyce-Gibbons, A. (in press). Multi-touch tables and collaborative learning. British Journal of Educational Technology. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01259.x

16 Hoyles, C., Noss, R., Kent, P. & Bakker, A. (2010). Improving Mathematics at Work: The need for techno-mathematical literacies. (Routledge: London)

17 Jenkins, H. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. White paper for the MacArthurFoundation. Retrieved on July 1, 2008, from http://
newmedialiteracies.org/files/working/NMLWhitePaper.pdf

18 Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking University Teaching: A Conversational Framework for the Effective Use of Learning Technologies. 2nd edition. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

19 Manches, A., & Price, S. (2011). Designing Learning Representations around Physical Manipulation: Hands and Objects. Paper presented at the 10th Interaction Design and Children Conference, Boston, US.

20 Mason, Robin (2005). The evolution of Online Education at the Open University. In: Kearsely, Greg ed. Online learning: Personal reflections on the transformation of education. USA: Educational Technology Publications.

21 Noss, R., Poulovassilis, A., Geraniou, E., Gutierrez-Santos, S., Hoyles, C., Kahn, K., Magoulas, G.D., & Mavrikis, M. (in press). The design of a system to support exploratory learning of algebraic generalisation. Computers & Education, published online ahead of print 2011, doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.021

22 Perrotta,C. & Wright, M. (2010). New assessment scenarios. Futurelab report (www.futurelab.org.uk)

23 Porayska-Pomsta, K., Frauenberger, C., Pain, H., Rajendran, G. & Smith, T. et al. (2012). Developing technology for autism: An interdisciplinary approach. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 2012, Volume 16, Number 2, Pages 117-127

24 Rainie, L. “Digital ‘Natives’ Invade the Workplace,” Pew Internet and American Life Project, Sept. 27, 2006. http://www.pewinternet.com/~/media/Files/Presentations/2006/New%20Workers.pdf

25 Ripley, M. (2007). E-assessment – an update on research, policy and practice. Futurelab literature review Report 10 update (www.futurelab.org.uk)

26 Scanlon, E., Blake, C., Twiner, A., Collins, T., Jones, A., & Kerawalla, L. (2011, July). Collaboration in communities of inquirers:
An example from a geography field trip. Paper presented at the Computer
Supported Collaborative Learning conference, Hong Kong.

27 Schwartz, D., Brophy, S., Lin, X., & Bransford, J. (1999). Software for managing complex learning: Examples from an educational psychology course. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 47(2), 39-59.

28 Seitemaa-Hakkarainen, P., Viilo, M. & Hakkarainen, K. (2010). Learning by collaborative designing: Technology enhanced knowledge practices.
International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20(2), 109-136.

29 Sharples, M., Scanlon, E. et al. (2011). Final Report: Personal Inquiry (PI): Designing for Evidence-based Inquiry Learning across Formal and Informal Settings.

30 Sharples, M. (2000). The Design of Personal Mobile Technologies for Lifelong Learning. Computers and Education, 34, 177-193.

31 Trinder, K., Guiller, J. & Margaryan, A. (2008). Learning from digital natives: bridging formal and informal learning. YORK: The Higher Education Academy. http://www.gcu.ac.uk/media/gcalwebv2/academy/content/ldn/LDNFinalReport.pdf

32 Trninic, D., Reinholz, D. L., Howison, M., & Abrahamson, D. (2010). Design as an object-to-think-with: semiotic potential emerges through collaborative reflective conversation with material. Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Meeting of the North-American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Morelia, Mexico.

33 Vavoula, G., M. Sharples, P. Rudman, J. Meek, and P. Lonsdale. (2009). MyArtSpace: Design and evaluation of support for learning with multimedia phones between classrooms and museums. Computers & Education 53, 2, 286–99.

34 Warwick, P., Mercer, N., Kershner, R., & Kleine Staarman, J. (2010). In the mind and in the technology: The vicarious presence of the teacher in pupils’ learning of science in collaborative group activity at the interactive whiteboard. Computers and Education, 55(1), 350-362.

35 Wood, D. J., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychiatry and Psychology, 17(2), 89-100.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>